Corn Silage Quality and Inventory Management

Quality Corn Silage


To ensure a high-quality silage feed source it is important to correctly follow all the critical steps during silage harvest and silo fill. This is an inch by inch and minute by minute process during harvest. The five Cs of quality corn silage are:

  • Content of dry matter (DM): 35% DM, which can vary by storage type  

  • Chop length: three quarters of an inch for kernel processed silage

  • Compaction of the silage: density of 14 to 16 pounds DM per cubic foot 

  • Covering silage: an oxygen barrier and cover or oxygen limiting structure

  • Care and management at feeding: firm feeding face and feed all loose silage1

Once the corn is in the silo and ensiled there are no products, activities or strategies that will correct mismanagement that occurred at silo fill. Only after the correct steps are taken at harvest can silage coming out of the silo provide a quality feed that is a good source of energy and high-quality fiber.


Silage Storage


Each silo type has advantages and disadvantages as a storage structure. All silage structures are designed to provide an oxygen limiting environment that is critical to completing the ensiling process. Bacteria causes fermentation that turns green chop into silage. Once harvested and packed to push out the oxygen, the naturally occurring anaerobic bacteria in the green chop produce lactic acid that lowers the pH to around 4.0. It is very important to select a silo structure that matches the size of the feeding operation to supply the volume of silage required to fill ration requirements. Silo structures that are too large for the size of the feeding operation can cause potential excessive silage losses due to large surface area and/or large feeding face. Silos that are too small will limit the size of the feeding operation or the amount of silage that can be used in the ration.


For more information on silage storage structures, select from the menu below.

Storage Losses and Inventory Management


Carefully monitoring feed inventory can help livestock producers control feed costs (one of their largest expenses) and maximize profitability. The feed inventory can be a valuable tool for determining available feed supply, estimating total feed needs for the planned herd size, and adjusting herd numbers or planning feed purchases when prices are favorable. The inventory should be adjusted as needed to account for storage and feeding losses. Silage storage losses can be high if crops are not harvested at the proper dry matter content, facilities are inadequate, the crop is not chopped correctly or packed well, and/or silos are not sealed properly. Dry matter loss during ensiling is an important factor to consider when selecting a storage system. The capacity of a silo significantly affects dry matter loss during feedout due to the amount of exposed surface area—the smaller the silo, the higher the loss. Average losses of dry matter associated with harvest, storage, and feeding also vary depending on the corn silage dry matter content. Silage must be fed soon after removal from storage to avoid spoilage due to oxygen exposure. Storage facilities with an exposed silage surface must be sized to match the feeding rate to prevent spoilage. Loose silage is more porous and allows greater air infiltration which increases the rate of aerobic growth which makes the silage susceptible to spoilage. Maintaining a firm face and cleaning up loose silage that has fallen to the floor during feedout will help minimize aerobic losses. Also, when silage feeding is discontinued for a long period, resealing is ideal to avoid greater storage losses and spoilage problems.


Mycotoxins in Silage


Mycotoxins are toxic substances produced by molds growing on grain or feed. Many molds that grow on silage are harmless, but a few species can produce mycotoxins. Mycotoxins can occur both in the field as well as later in storage with potential adverse effects to herd health and production. The most common mycotoxins in silage are aflatoxins, trichothecenes, ochratoxin A, fumonisins, zearalenone, and many other fungal secondary metabolites.5 Problems associated with mycotoxins in silage can be minimized by preventing fungal growth before and after ensiling. Proper silage management is essential to reduce mycotoxin contamination of feeds. Contaminated feed is rarely fatal, but can reduce growth rate, lower feed conversion, lower reproductive rate, impair disease resistance, and reduce vaccination efficacy. 

Conducive microclimates for mold proliferation and mycotoxin production include: 

  • Delayed harvests 

  • Slow silo fill rate 

  • Inadequate packing and sealing of silo 

  • No silo cover 

  • Bridging in silage bag

  • Damaged plastic wrap, bags, or silo covers  

  • Slow feedout rate

  • Not feeding all silage removed from surface 

Some molds can survive even in extreme conditions and still produce mycotoxins. Toxins that are present prior to ensiling will be present even after proper ensiling. If mold or mycotoxins are suspected, testing is recommended to confirm the potential level and feeding restrictions.


Forage Analysis


Forage analysis is essential for any cattle feeding program. Testing is important before silage feeding starts but after ensiling is complete (usually three weeks after harvest) to formulate a balanced ration. It is also important to periodically test during the feeding cycle. As analysis changes so does the need to adjust the ration. Nutritionists use silage testing to determine the dry matter, energy, fiber, mineral, and protein along with other factors to formulate a balance, cost effective ration. For more information about silage analysis contact your local nutritionist or veterinarian. 


1Quinn, R. 2019 Maximize Silage Quality High-Quality Corn Silage Needs Management Progressive Farmer

2Lawrence, J., Kuck, R., 2017. Drive Over Pile vs. Bag vs. Bunk Storage

 3Lallemand Forward 2020, Silage in bags, Lallemand Animal Nutrition     

 4Lallemand Forward 2020, Silage in tower silos, Lallemand Animal Nutrition

5Ogunade, I. M., Martinez-Tuppia, C., Queiroz, O.C.M., Jiang, Y., Drouin, P., Wu, F., Vyas, D., Adesogan, A.T. 2018. Silage review: Mycotoxins in silage: Occurrence, effects, prevention, and mitigation, Journal of Dairy Science

Web sources verified 1/21/21. 1032_S5

This browser is no longer supported. Please switch to a supported browser: Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari.